The level of questioning ACB endured with grace and aplomb is a testament to her fortitude and charity. Was there a point to any of it as all Democrats have declared they will refuse to vote on her nomination?
And Burgess Owens joins the program to discuss his congressional race!!
Download our latest PDF Guide at: GUIDE: Talking to your high schoolers about politics!!
Thank you for listening!!
SiriusXM picked up the program on Sundays from 10-noon ET!! So EXCITING!!!! Right now there is a 4 months free promo running so sign up for SiriusXM y'all!
Please visit [Family Vision Media](familyvisionmedia.org)! and download our first Guide dealing with discussing politics with your college aged kids!!!
Donate to support the show here: paypal.me/stacyontheright
Or join our Patreon: patreon.com/stacyontheright
Thanks and God Bless ya!!
-- Spiritual Encouragement --
Looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith... Hebrews 12:2
-- Stacy's Stash! --
For links to the articles and material referenced in this week's episode check out this week's page from our podcast dashboard!
-- Get More Stacy --
Watch the show live, download previous episodes, and more Stacy!
stacy [at] stacyontheright.com
-- Connect with Stacy --
- Confirmation hearing's viral moments: Amy Coney Barrett's blan and Sen. Whitehouse's presentation — "Is there anything on it?" Cornyn asked as she held up a blank white notepad with blue lettering at the top. "The letterhead says United States Senate," Barrett replied. Cornyn told her, "that's impressive."
- Democrats Smear Amy Coney Barrett for Saying ‘Sexual Preference’ | National Review — To get a sense of how well Amy Coney Barrett did on the first day of her Supreme Court confirmation hearings, you have to appreciate the fact that the biggest “controversy” of the day was the fact that she uttered the words “sexual preference” rather than “sexual orientation” — something that Joe Biden did in May 2020 and Ruth Bader Ginsburg did in 2017.
- Barrett continues her seminar on legal severability, with a focus on the ACA | Just The News — The reason for Barrett's explanation of the legal doctrine is because next month, the Supreme Court will hear arguments surrounding the legality of the Affordable Care Act, which, depending on the court's ruling, could be imperiled. Barrett would not share with the panel how she would vote on the case, but said, "the presumption is always in favor of severability."